Sign in or
| You may have heard, as I did, that another WTC tower had also "collapsed" on 9/11, but few people have seen the video after it was first shown, mostly because it was hardly ever shown on mainstream media. |
Watching the video recently, I could not believe anyone was seriously, honestly arguing that it was not taken down by controlled demolition. I mean, come on!
|Just watch it.|
|And then watch a side by side comparison with another controlled demolition.|
| Here are most (all?) of the views of the WTC 7 "collapse", without sound, compiled by Xenomorph911WTC. |
This is so obviously a controlled demolition that it is laughable to hear anyone try to claim otherwise.
How could the 47 floors of WTC building 7 fall as fast as they did? How fast did it fall? Here are several videos showing analysis of the WTC 7 demolition in near-free-fall time:
| WTC 7 Free Fall Collapse|
This video uses ExploreScience to show that for 4.5 seconds (but see next video), WTC-7 falls faster than free-fall through air, and thus equivalent to free-fall in a vacuum, as if it fell with NO air resistance.
"We must conclude that a vacuum was created characteristic of an implosion where the structure is "pulled" down by a controlled demolition."
| WTC7 in Freefall--No Longer Controversial|
David Chandler shows that freefall (with NO air resistance) occurs for 2.5 seconds during the demolition.
The "collapse" of WTC-7 happened in near-free-fall time overall, and actual free-fall for 2.5 seconds. NIST attempted to deny it for a long time, and then finally admitted it, but included the early collapse of parts of the building before the majority of the building was falling, thus stretching the overall time, and lowering the average acceleration.
What does it mean that the building was falling for 2.5 seconds in free-fall? It means that there was NO structure to resist the fall during that whole period of time. How could there be no structure? The columns would have to be removed as fast as the building is falling.
|WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I)|
|WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part II)|
|WTC7: Nist Finally Admits Freefall (Part III)|
| New video posted in November 2008 shows the collapse of WTC7 from a closer vantage point. We can analyze the new video with high school physics.|
The original video includes WTC7 and the North Tower collapse. Watch in high resolution.
|NIST Lies: Final Report on World Trade Center Building Seven|
Other studies of the WTC-7 collapse
- THE FEMA REPORT ON WORLD TRADE CENTER 7 COLLAPSE IS A TOTAL JOKE. Feb 2003, shows many details of the building structure and the possible damage to the building before the collapse.
Latest page update: made by liberte
, May 11 2010, 11:10 AM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
replace videos that moved
1 widget added
4 widgets deleted
- complete history)
Keyword tags: None
More Info: links to this page
There are no threads for this page. Be the first to start a new thread.